RSS Feed Retriever: installs, ratings and growth stats

By Travis · Rank #2687

RSS Feed Retriever is a WordPress.org plugin tracked daily by HostList. Current WordPress.org active-install bucket: 7K+. Rating: 4.7 out of 5 from 38 ratings. HostList snapshots installs, ratings, and support signals so you can see freshness and direction, then follow the hosting links below for WordPress and stack-fit guidance. Active installs are ranges published by WordPress.org, not exact counts. HostList rank is by active-install bucket only. This page is a hosting-support resource, not a paid plugin ranking.

Over the last 76 days with download data, WordPress.org recorded about 1,713 downloads for RSS Feed Retriever. HostList install rank: #2687. Use the charts below for direction, then pick hosting that matches the plugin's cache, PHP, and ecommerce needs.

Active installs
7K+
Rating
4.7 / 5
Ratings count
38
Support resolved
n/a

The fastest RSS feeds plugin for WordPress. Includes excerpt & thumbnail image. Use as a news aggregator, autoblog, or RSS parsing.

Install trend

7K+ active installs, unchanged since 19 July 2026. WordPress.org reports installs in rounded buckets, so this figure only moves when the plugin crosses a bucket boundary.

Daily downloads

Exact daily download counts from WordPress.org (not install buckets).

Technical details

Related hosting on HostList

More WordPress plugins

Next by HostList install rank after RSS Feed Retriever.

FAQ

How many sites use RSS Feed Retriever?

WordPress.org reports an active-install bucket of 7K+. That is a rounded range, not an exact site count.

Is RSS Feed Retriever actively maintained?

WordPress.org last listed an update on 6 January 2023. It is tested up to WordPress 6.1.12.

What hosting should I use with RSS Feed Retriever?

Start with HostList guidance on Best WordPress hosting. Match the host stack (caching layer, managed WordPress policies, ecommerce readiness) to what this plugin needs.

Data aggregated from WordPress.org. Active installs are published buckets, not exact counts.