Link Juice Keeper: installs, ratings and growth stats

By George Pattichis · Rank #1757

Link Juice Keeper is a WordPress.org plugin tracked daily by HostList. Current WordPress.org active-install bucket: 10K+. Rating: 4.7 out of 5 from 15 ratings. HostList snapshots installs, ratings, and support signals so you can see freshness and direction, then follow the hosting links below for WordPress and stack-fit guidance. Active installs are ranges published by WordPress.org, not exact counts. HostList rank is by active-install bucket only. This page is a hosting-support resource, not a paid plugin ranking.

Over the last 82 days with download data, WordPress.org recorded about 7,852 downloads for Link Juice Keeper. HostList install rank: #1757. Use the charts below for direction, then pick hosting that matches the plugin's cache, PHP, and ecommerce needs.

Active installs
10K+
Rating
4.7 / 5
Ratings count
15
Support resolved
n/a

Improve your SEO and keep your link juice by automatically redirecting all 404 errors to any page/post/url. User friendly options and log feature.

Install trend

10K+ active installs, unchanged since 19 July 2026. WordPress.org reports installs in rounded buckets, so this figure only moves when the plugin crosses a bucket boundary.

Daily downloads

Exact daily download counts from WordPress.org (not install buckets).

Technical details

Related hosting on HostList

More WordPress plugins

Next by HostList install rank after Link Juice Keeper.

FAQ

How many sites use Link Juice Keeper?

WordPress.org reports an active-install bucket of 10K+. That is a rounded range, not an exact site count.

Is Link Juice Keeper actively maintained?

WordPress.org last listed an update on 24 August 2026. It is tested up to WordPress 6.8.6.

What hosting should I use with Link Juice Keeper?

Start with HostList guidance on Best WordPress hosting. Match the host stack (caching layer, managed WordPress policies, ecommerce readiness) to what this plugin needs.

Data aggregated from WordPress.org. Active installs are published buckets, not exact counts.