W3 Total Cache vs WP Fastest Cache
Side-by-side WordPress.org install buckets, ratings, and support signals. Neither side can pay for a win.
| Metric | W3 Total Cache | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| Active installs | 900K+ | 1M+ |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.9 / 5 |
| Number of ratings | 5,420 | 4,224 |
| Support resolved | 72.7% | 20% |
| Rank by installs | #71 | #63 |
| Tested up to | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | false |
Methodology and snapshot notes
W3 Total Cache vs WP Fastest Cache is a data-led WordPress plugin comparison on HostList. Both sides use the same WordPress.org signals: active-install buckets, ratings, rating volume, and support resolution where available. Neither plugin vendor can pay for a win on this page. Use the numbers to shortlist a tool, then follow the hosting links for WordPress, WooCommerce, caching, or security fit. Active installs are ranges, not exact counts. HostList rank is by active-install bucket only (alphabetical tiebreak within a bucket).
As of the latest HostList snapshot, W3 Total Cache sits at 900K+ active installs with a 4.4/5 rating from 5,420 reviews (rank #71 by installs). WP Fastest Cache is at 1M+, 4.9/5 from 4,224 reviews (rank #63). Support resolution is 72.7% for W3 Total Cache and 20% for WP Fastest Cache. Prefer the side whose install bucket, rating volume, and support load match your risk tolerance, then pick hosting that fits that stack.
Hosting for this stack
W3 Total Cache
WP Fastest Cache
Data aggregated from WordPress.org. Active installs are published buckets, not exact counts. Category: caching.