LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Fastest Cache
Side-by-side WordPress.org install buckets, ratings, and support signals. Neither side can pay for a win.
| Metric | LiteSpeed Cache | WP Fastest Cache |
|---|---|---|
| Active installs | 7M+ | 1M+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.9 / 5 |
| Number of ratings | 2,770 | 4,224 |
| Support resolved | 50.7% | 20% |
| Rank by installs | #5 | #63 |
| Tested up to | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | false |
Methodology and snapshot notes
LiteSpeed Cache vs WP Fastest Cache is a data-led WordPress plugin comparison on HostList. Both sides use the same WordPress.org signals: active-install buckets, ratings, rating volume, and support resolution where available. Neither plugin vendor can pay for a win on this page. Use the numbers to shortlist a tool, then follow the hosting links for WordPress, WooCommerce, caching, or security fit. Active installs are ranges, not exact counts. HostList rank is by active-install bucket only (alphabetical tiebreak within a bucket).
As of the latest HostList snapshot, LiteSpeed Cache sits at 7M+ active installs with a 4.8/5 rating from 2,770 reviews (rank #5 by installs). WP Fastest Cache is at 1M+, 4.9/5 from 4,224 reviews (rank #63). Support resolution is 50.7% for LiteSpeed Cache and 20% for WP Fastest Cache. Prefer the side whose install bucket, rating volume, and support load match your risk tolerance, then pick hosting that fits that stack.
Hosting for this stack
LiteSpeed Cache
WP Fastest Cache
Data aggregated from WordPress.org. Active installs are published buckets, not exact counts. Category: caching.