EWWW Image Optimizer vs Smush
Side-by-side WordPress.org install buckets, ratings, and support signals. Neither side can pay for a win.
| Metric | EWWW Image Optimizer | Smush |
|---|---|---|
| Active installs | 1M+ | 1M+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Number of ratings | 1,841 | 6,053 |
| Support resolved | 25% | 88.9% |
| Rank by installs | #41 | #57 |
| Tested up to | 7.1.3 | 7.1.3 |
| Requires PHP | 7.4 | 7.4 |
Methodology and snapshot notes
EWWW Image Optimizer vs Smush is a data-led WordPress plugin comparison on HostList. Both sides use the same WordPress.org signals: active-install buckets, ratings, rating volume, and support resolution where available. Neither plugin vendor can pay for a win on this page. Use the numbers to shortlist a tool, then follow the hosting links for WordPress, WooCommerce, caching, or security fit. Active installs are ranges, not exact counts. HostList rank is by active-install bucket only (alphabetical tiebreak within a bucket).
As of the latest HostList snapshot, EWWW Image Optimizer sits at 1M+ active installs with a 4.8/5 rating from 1,841 reviews (rank #41 by installs). Smush is at 1M+, 4.8/5 from 6,053 reviews (rank #57). Support resolution is 25% for EWWW Image Optimizer and 88.9% for Smush. Prefer the side whose install bucket, rating volume, and support load match your risk tolerance, then pick hosting that fits that stack.
Hosting for this stack
EWWW Image Optimizer
Data aggregated from WordPress.org. Active installs are published buckets, not exact counts. Category: caching.