Autoptimize vs LiteSpeed Cache
Side-by-side WordPress.org install buckets, ratings, and support signals. Neither side can pay for a win.
| Metric | Autoptimize | LiteSpeed Cache |
|---|---|---|
| Active installs | 800K+ | 7M+ |
| Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Number of ratings | 1,427 | 2,760 |
| Support resolved | 33.3% | 68.9% |
| Rank by installs | #75 | #5 |
| Tested up to | 6.9.5 | 6.9.5 |
| Requires PHP | 7.1 | 7.2 |
Methodology and snapshot notes
Autoptimize vs LiteSpeed Cache is a data-led WordPress plugin comparison on HostList. Both sides use the same WordPress.org signals: active-install buckets, ratings, rating volume, and support resolution where available. Neither plugin vendor can pay for a win on this page. Use the numbers to shortlist a tool, then follow the hosting links for WordPress, WooCommerce, caching, or security fit. Active installs are ranges, not exact counts. HostList rank is by active-install bucket only (alphabetical tiebreak within a bucket).
As of the latest HostList snapshot, Autoptimize sits at 800K+ active installs with a 4.7/5 rating from 1,427 reviews (rank #75 by installs). LiteSpeed Cache is at 7M+, 4.8/5 from 2,760 reviews (rank #5). Support resolution is 33.3% for Autoptimize and 68.9% for LiteSpeed Cache. Prefer the side whose install bucket, rating volume, and support load match your risk tolerance, then pick hosting that fits that stack.
Hosting for this stack
Autoptimize
LiteSpeed Cache
Data aggregated from WordPress.org. Active installs are published buckets, not exact counts. Category: caching.