BEST
FTP-HOSTING
20 ftp-hosting providers ranked by HRI™ in 2026. Rankings are never paid.
Last updated:
What Is the Best FTP-Hosting in 2026?
FTP-Hosting ist Webhosting, das zuverlässigen FTP-, SFTP- oder FTPS-Zugriff zum Hochladen und Verwalten von Website-Dateien bietet, entscheidend für Legacy-Workflows, große Medien-Uploads und Entwickler, die über FileZilla oder CI-Skripte bereitstellen. Die besten FTP-Hosting-Anbieter unterstützen SFTP standardmäßig, isolieren Accounts auf Shared-Servern ordnungsgemäß und drosseln legitime Massen-Uploads nicht. As of 6 October 2026, the highest-scoring ftp-hosting on HostList are DreamHost (97/100), SiteGround (97/100), InMotion Hosting (96/100), ranked purely by HRI, an independent algorithmic rating. No platform pays for placement and no position is chosen by hand. Rankings update continuously as Google review, Trustpilot, and profile data refresh. Each profile lists pricing where available, plan tiers, supported features, and verified customer rating data from Google and Trustpilot. Use the rankings below to compare providers head-to-head, or use HostMatch (hostlist.io/match) for a personalised recommendation based on your specific project requirements, traffic volume, and geographic audience.
FTP-Hosting ist relevant, wenn Ihr Workflow von Dateiübertragung statt von Git-Push-Deployments abhängt. Agenturen, die Legacy-PHP-Websites pflegen, Designer, die große Asset-Pakete hochladen, und Backup-Skripte verlassen sich oft weiterhin auf SFTP. Moderne Plattformen verstecken FTP zunehmend hinter proprietären Panels, daher ist explizite SFTP-Unterstützung ein Merkmal, das Sie gezielt prüfen sollten.
Bevorzugen Sie SFTP oder FTPS gegenüber einfachem FTP; unverschlüsseltes FTP sendet Anmeldedaten im Klartext. Gute Hosting-Anbieter deaktivieren unsicheres FTP standardmäßig oder raten dringend davon ab. Bei Shared-Hosting sollten Sie vor der Migration eines Medienarchivs Inode- und Upload-Größenlimits prüfen.
Wenn Sie Next.js oder statische Websites aus Git bereitstellen, sehen Sie sich stattdessen Jamstack- oder Framework-Hosting an. Diese Kategorie ist für dateiübertragungszentrierte Workflows auf traditionellen Hosting-Stacks gedacht.
- #1Deal97DreamHostHQ: Brea, USA
DreamHost is a leader in AI-powered website and web app creation, helping over 400,000 small businesses, developers, and creators build and own their …
4.6★ TPTrust 24/25View → - #297SiteGroundHQ: Sofia, Bulgaria
SiteGround, founded in 2004 in Sofia, Bulgaria, offers a range of web hosting services including shared, WordPress, WooCommerce, and cloud hosting. It…
4.9★ TPTrust 25/25View → - #3Deal96InMotion HostingHQ: Virginia Beach, USA
Founded in 2001, InMotion Hosting provides web hosting, infrastructure solutions, and managed services for businesses and individuals at every stage o…
4.6★ TPTrust 25/25View →
| Rank | Provider | Headquarters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | DreamHostDeal | 97/100 | 24 | 25 | 23 | 4.6★TP | HQ: Brea, USA |
| #2 | SiteGround | 97/100 | 25 | 24 | 23 | 4.9★TP | HQ: Sofia, Bulgaria |
| #3 | InMotion HostingDeal | 96/100 | 25 | 23 | 23 | 4.6★TP | HQ: Virginia Beach, USA |
| #4 | HIPAA Vault | 95/100 | 25 | 23 | 22 | 4.1★TP | HQ: Wyoming, USA |
| #5 | HostingerDeal | 93/100 | 25 | 20 | 23 | 4.7★TP | HQ: Vilnius, Lithuania |
| #6 | IONOS | 88/100 | 25 | 20 | 18 | 4.6★TP | HQ: Montabaur, Germany |
| #7 | GameHostCloud | 65/100 | 6 | 23 | 11 | 3.8★TP | HQ: Heinola, Finland |
| #8 | Ridgeon Network | 62/100 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 5★G | HQ: Market Harborough, UK |
| #9 | City Communications | 62/100 | 11 | 15 | 11 | 5★G | HQ: Nottingham, UK |
| #10 | Techno Bird | 61/100 | 5 | 20 | 11 | · | HQ: Rawalpindi, Pakistan |
| #11 | Chase Computer Services, Inc. | 59/100 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 5★G | HQ: USA |
| #12 | Domaist Web Solution | 57/100 | 6 | 15 | 11 | 3.7★G | HQ: New York City, USA |
| #13 | Porkbun | 55/100 | 2 | 17 | 11 | · | HQ: Sherwood, USA |
| #14 | Files.com | 53/100 | 2 | 15 | 11 | · | HQ: Tempe, USA |
| #15 | 1point3 | 51/100 | 0 | 15 | 11 | · | HQ: Rothwell, UK |
| #16 | AA Hosting | 51/100 | 0 | 15 | 11 | · | HQ: London, UK |
| #17 | Avrohost | 51/100 | 0 | 15 | 11 | · | HQ: Yerevan, Armenia |
| #18 | AWebSmith | 51/100 | 0 | 15 | 11 | · | HQ: Ocala, USA |
| #19 | banan.cz | 51/100 | 0 | 15 | 11 | · | HQ: Ostrava-privoz, Czech Republic |
| #20 | BestHosting.ua | 51/100 | 0 | 15 | 11 | · | HQ: Vinnytsia, Ukraine |
Most compared this month
Ranked by how many different comparison pages each host turned up in over the last 30 days. Tap a heart to keep one for later.
- 0198582 comparisons
- 0297548 comparisons
- 0398548 comparisons
- 0497535 comparisons
- 0597531 comparisons
- 0697518 comparisons
- 0797468 comparisons
- 0897361 comparisons
How Is the Best FTP-Hosting List Selected?
The best ftp-hosting list is selected entirely by HRI, an independent algorithmic 0 to 100 rating that combines four equally-weighted components: customer trust signals from real reviews (25%), public profile completeness (25%), data freshness (25%), and infrastructure performance signals (25%). Brand awareness, marketing spend, and affiliate relationships are not inputs.
Hosting companies cannot pay to appear or improve their position. Sponsorships and advertising are not scoring inputs. The same rules apply to every company in the directory of over 30,000 providers, from the largest hyperscalers to single-region indie hosts.
For the full breakdown of each scoring component and how it is calculated, see the HRI methodology page.
Directory data, HRI scores, prices, and features are informational and may lag real-world changes. Always confirm current details with the provider before you buy. HostList does not guarantee accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any purchasing decision. Ratings disclaimer · Terms.
Are HostList’s Rankings Paid Placements?
No. HostList does not sell rankings or accept payment for placement. Hosting companies cannot pay to appear in best ftp-hosting or improve their position. Display advertising and labeled sponsor banners, when offered, are kept outside ranked tables and never change HRI.
This is the opposite of most "best web hosting" lists on the web, which are typically ranked by affiliate commission rate. Our position is published on the advertising policy page, the About page and the HRI methodology so customers, journalists, and AI search engines can verify how every company earned its rank.
Frequently Asked Questions About FTP-Hosting
Was ist FTP-Hosting?
FTP-Hosting ist Webhosting mit Zugriff per File Transfer Protocol (vorzugsweise SFTP oder FTPS) zum Hochladen und Verwalten von Website-Dateien. Es eignet sich für Legacy-Websites, Designer, die Desktop-FTP-Clients verwenden, und automatisierte Deploy-Skripte, die rsync oder lftp über SSH nutzen.
Ist SFTP dasselbe wie FTP?
SFTP läuft über SSH und verschlüsselt den gesamten Dateitransfer. Klassisches FTP ist unverschlüsselt und sollte im öffentlichen Internet vermieden werden. Wenn Hosting-Anbieter heute von FTP-Zugang sprechen, meinen sie meist SFTP; bestätigen Sie dies, bevor Sie Produktionszugangsdaten verwenden.
Benötige ich bei WordPress weiterhin FTP?
Der WordPress-Adminbereich und die Dateimanager vieler Hosting-Anbieter reduzieren die tägliche FTP-Nutzung, aber SFTP bleibt essenziell für Massen-Uploads, Notfallbehebungen sowie Plugin- oder Theme-Entwicklung. Entwickler und Agenturen sollten auch bei Managed-WordPress-Tarifen auf SFTP bestehen.
Welche Hosting-Anbieter bieten den besten SFTP-Zugang?
Die meisten unternehmensgerechten Shared-Hosting-Anbieter (SiteGround, A2 Hosting, DreamHost, InMotion) enthalten SFTP in allen Tarifen. Prüfen Sie die Account-Isolation auf Shared-Servern und die maximale Upload-Größe, wenn Sie große Medienbibliotheken übertragen.
NEED HELP WITH A
WEBSITE OR MIGRATION?
Describe your requirements and our team will recommend the right hosting setup, or handle the entire migration for you.
NOT SURE WHICH TO PICK?
Describe your project and let our AI match you with the best host.
Find your perfect host with HostMatch →Popular FTP-Hosting Comparisons
More developer runtimes
Closest categories to ftp-hosting, each ranked by the same HRI™ model.