Is Liquid Web better than Key Technologies (Key Communications)?

Liquid Web scores higher on HostScore (85/100 vs 53/100), reflecting stronger trust signals, profile completeness, and review data. Key Technologies (Key Communications) may still suit users who need its specific location (Australia) or specialization (pure host). HostScore is an objective algorithmic rating , it does not account for pricing, which can vary significantly between providers.

Which has better customer reviews , Liquid Web or Key Technologies (Key Communications)?

Liquid Web has 4.3★ on Google (140 reviews), and Key Technologies (Key Communications) has 4.8★ on Google (20 reviews). Review volume matters as much as the star rating , a 4.5★ score from 50 reviews is less reliable than a 4.2★ score from 5,000. HostScore weights Google reviews by volume, so providers with more verified customer feedback score higher on the trust component. Check each provider's Trustpilot profile for a second independent signal before deciding.

What are good alternatives to Liquid Web and Key Technologies (Key Communications)?

The best alternative depends on what you value. If you want unbiased rankings across all hosting types, the HostList directory ranks 28,000+ providers by HostScore. For AI-powered matching based on your specific project requirements , tech stack, traffic, location, budget , use HostMatch at hostlist.io/match. For category-specific alternatives, the pure host rankings at hostlist.io show the highest-scoring providers in the same hosting type as Liquid Web and Key Technologies (Key Communications).

LIQUID WEBVSKEY TECHNOLOGIES (KEY COMMUNICATIONS)

Name: Liquid Web
Brand: Liquid Web
Availability: InStock
Rating: 4.3 (140 reviews)

Side-by-side comparison using HostScore™ data, Google reviews, and Trustpilot scores. No paid placements , ranked by signal only.

Updated 20 May 2026·Independent · no paid placements

Quick Verdict

WHICH IS BETTER?

As of 2026, Liquid Web scores 85/100 on HostList's HostScore algorithm versus Key Technologies (Key Communications)'s 53/100, making Liquid Web the higher-rated provider in this comparison. Liquid Web leads by a clear margin across trust signals, profile completeness, and freshness data. On Google reviews, Key Technologies (Key Communications) rates 4.8/5 from 20 verified reviews , stronger customer sentiment than Liquid Web's 4.3/5. Liquid Web is based in HQ: Lansing, USA, while Key Technologies (Key Communications) operates from HQ: Brisbane, Australia , worth considering if your audience has regional latency requirements. HostScore is an independent 0–100 algorithmic rating combining trust signals (45 points), profile completeness (25 points), data freshness (20 points), and performance (10 points) , never paid placements.

Metric

HostScore™	85	,	53
Trust Score	22	,	11
Completeness	20	,	12
Performance	18	,	5
Freshness	25	,	25
Google Rating	4.3★	,	4.8★
Google Reviews	140	,	20
Trustpilot	,	,	,
Location	HQ: Lansing, USA	,	HQ: Brisbane, Australia
Founded	1997	,	,
Segment	PURE HOST	,	PURE HOST
Claimed	No	,	No

LIQUID WEBVSKEY TECHNOLOGIES (KEY COMMUNICATIONS)

WHICH IS BETTER?

PROS & CONS

Liquid Web

Key Technologies (Key Communications)

WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?

WHAT IS LIQUID WEB?

WHAT IS KEY TECHNOLOGIES (KEY COMMUNICATIONS)?